Good vs. Evil Essay Example for Free

Good vs. Evil Essay Beowulf is a long narrative between good and evil. Throughout Beowulf, it was shown that two opposites could not peacefully live. Beowulf is divided into three parts, each centers around Beowulf fight with a particular monster: first Grendel, then Grendel’s Mother, and last the Dragon. Each monster presents a specific moral challenge. Beowulfs fight with Grendel brings to mind the importance of character as a means of expanding one’s survival past death. Beowulfs battle with Grendels mother was all about retaliation. Just as Beowulf wanted revenge at Grendel for killing Hrothgar’s men. So Grendel mother thought she could get rid of her sorrow by slaying her son’s murderer. Beowulfs last fight with the dragon represents a heroic approach to fate. Though he recognizes that his time has come and that he will not survive his clash with the dragon, he bravely embraces his duty to protect his people, sacrificing his life to save them. 2nd Paragraph- Tell what the word theme means. What is the theme of Beowulf and what does good mean. What does evil mean. Who were two good people in the story. Who were two evil people in the story. Theme is the central idea or main purpose of a story. Sometimes it is called the moral of the story. In Beowlf, †¦. 3rd paragraph- Tell about the good people in the story and tell one good thing they did. One good character in Beowulf was King Hrothgar. He is the King of Danes. He has a great deal of compassion for his warriors and his people. He builds a mead-hall and names it Herot for his warriors to celebrate success. Hrothgar is a wise and admirable king to his people, but lacks strength to physically combat his and his people’s enemies, as he is an aging King. Another good character was Wiglaf he is a warrior who aids Beowulf against the battle with the dragon. Even though Beowulf other men ran, Wiglaf stayed loyal to his king. Wiglaf is a younger companion to Beowulf and in his courage shows himself to be Beowulf’s successor. 4th paragraph- Tell about 2 evil people in the story and tell one evil thing they each did. One character that represented evil was the fire dragon. He†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 5th paragraph – Summary The world is full of good and evil. Good people and good deeds are the things that keep the world decent and worth living. It is the role of evil to try to oppose good. However as it happened in Beowulf, good always overcomes evil. There may be times when it seems that evil will triumph because it last so long like it did when Grendel ruled Herot for twelve years. Help did eventually come and evil was defeated.

The Use of Series in The Big Sleep by Raymond Chandler Essay -- sleep

The Use of Series in The Big Sleep by Raymond Chandler In The Big Sleep, Raymond Chandler writes items in a series in almost every paragraph that does not include dialogue, occasions, in the text where Marlowe watches the other character do something like open and close a book or light a cigarette and flick the ash into a tray. When Chandler stops the dialogue to creates a space for Marlowe to record elements in the environment, he constructs sentences that indicate how Marlowe assimilates the information: characters perform three or more acts successively and Marlowe notices every movement, recording it at once. Therefore, Chandler builds sentences that contain as many separate actions as possible to reflect how fast the character performs the act, rather than isolate single actions in single sentences that break the action up. Specifically, Chandler builds sentences with items in a series to reflect continuous motion and mimic the way Marlowe perceives it. Series are economical and fast, pointing to the movement of the cha racter and the way Marlowe thinks. The series occur in paragraphs Marlowe narrates, sections before or after dialogue when Marlowe establishes the scope of the scene or moves the scene along. Chandler uses the construction when he describes the principal action in a scene. For example, chapter 17 opens with a paragraph that includes this sentence: "The boy swung the car over to the box hedge in front of Geiger's house, killed the motor and sat looking straight before him with both hands on the wheel" (99). In the paragraph, Chandler describes the inert environment with one compound sentence and two simple sentences. None of them contain a series. The sentence that ... ...es the scene correctly and as quickly as Marlowe sees it. Chandler does not want to write a text that reminds the reader it is a text. Instead he wants to imitate reality. He wants the reader to follow Marlowe, look over his shoulder, and maintain a constant, attached point-of-view shot of the action. For this reason, Chandler uses series to simulate the rhythm and speed of real action. When a writer like Chandler omits words and replaces them with commas, "ands," and "ors," he makes the sentence concise and speedy. When one reads such a text, she understands two things about the scene: how the character moves and how Marlowe perceives the movement. Chandler is sensitive to the relationship between the text, the reader, reality. So he creates a text that mimics real movement and real thinking. He uses series to carry the reader through the text.

20 Years Ago India Essay

Twenty years ago this weekend, three top Indian officials burned the midnight oil tearing up old import controls and preparing a package of economic reforms that would slowly lead to the booming India that is widely admired today, with growth of 8-9%, 300-350m people enjoying the benefits of a consumer economy, and businessmen operating internationally. But India seems to be in no mood to celebrate that momentous event, just as it wasn’t at India’s 50th anniversary of independence in 1997 when the feeling was downbeat. People then were unsure of what to celebrate, since so little had been achieved in terms of economic development, care for the poor, and industrial efficiency since the British left in 1947. Ten years later, that had changed because of the economic boom of the intervening years. But the 1997 mood is now back again. People are aware that, despite all the economic and business successes, 800m people are still desperately poor and under-nourished, with poor access to clean water and health and education services. Public infrastructure and services are crumbling, national security and defence preparedness is woefully inadequate, and governance is sliding into a greedy, corrupt and inefficient abyss with no bottom in sight. Popular contrasts of India’s elephant and China’s tiger economies are being trotted out in various articles and studies, as they have been for 20 years. But the contrast is simplistic because India has its tiger industries such as information technology (IT), autos, pharma, and mobile telecoms that have been spurred by entrepreneurial drive and technological change. There are also rapidly industrializing states – notably Gujarat and Tamil Nadu (despite its political corruption). These are taking the place of India’s earlier internationally lauded cities, Bangalore and Hyderabad, the capitals of Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh that have been swamped by the greed and corruption of politicians and businessmen in areas such as land acquisition, mining and real estate. (The Karnataka chief minister is this week accused of facilitating multi-million dollar illegal mining). India’s blundering elephant is the government establishment that has refused over the past 20 years to change the way that the country is run. The 1991 whittling-down of the government’s role has not been followed through. The government still controls the mostly unreformed banking and defence sectors as well as the vast array of public sector industries and, in various ways, land useage and licensing, especially in the corrupt telecom sector. Such government controls skew development. When the current United Progressive Alliance (UPA) came to power in 2004, led by Sonia Gandhi and Manmohan Singh, reforms were initially held back by Communist-led Left Front that supported the government. Since the 2009 general election, reforms have been blocked by the disproportionate power of other coalition partners that have 20 or fewer MPs out of the coalition’s total of 262. The main problem however is that Sonia Gandhi, who heads the Congress Party, is not a firm enough believer in reforms to push Singh and his government into a tougher line, and Singh is too cautious. Consequently, a raft of reforms have been delayed including divestments of stakes in public sector businesses, increasing FDI in various sector such as defence, insurance and retail, and – most important of all – curbing subsidies. Montek Ahluwalia, whose Planning Commission is currently finalising a new five-year plan, argues that the future focus should be on three more urgent areas that would otherwise block economic progress – the use of energy and water, and urbanisation. These areas need changes of action by the central government, and even more by state governments, that has eluded India for the past 20 years. It is hard to see how India can tackle these issues, given that failure since 1991. People who are well off will of course do better, and the 300-350m people now enjoying varying levels of consumerism will increase in number and satisfaction. Companies will become more profitable and will become more internationally active. But social tensions will increase, with growing battles over the use of land and other scarce resources. Major reforms will be needed to reverse the trend of bad governance and corruption. It is an irony that, though the past 20 years began and now end with Manmohan Singh, he was neither in charge at the beginning, nor is he at the end. That is not a criticism, but in the early 1990s he could only do what he did courtesy of Narasimha Rao, and now he cannot do what he doesn’t do courtesy of Sonia Gandhi and the UPA’s coalition partners. Something surely needs to change.

Neuman Malik. Ms. Vritsios. Eng3Uo. Apace Behold Dives.

Neuman Malik Ms. Vritsios ENG3UO apace behold dives The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald and Life of Pi by Yann Martel are great novels which share common themes. The main characters of the novels are Gatsby and Pi, they share common goals. Gatsby and Pi go through isolation and put out love with hope to achieve the American dream. Gatsby and Pi are characters who never give up in achieving their goals. â€Å"Inside every rich man is a poor kid that followed his dreams.† Quote by Sandile Shezi. Shezi as a child used to sell muffins on the street, now at twenty-three years old he is a self-made millionaire. Shezi is the co-founder of Global Forex Institution, helping with affordable exchange training. The quote is†¦show more content†¦Gatsby’s parties were full of people who never knew each other. The people at the parties never knew Gatsby and Gatsby never knew them. All friendships and conversations were meaningless because after the party everyone leaves. Gatsby stands alone on his steps watching the party, but he makes no physical or social connections to any of his guests. Pi gets isolated from the rest of the world. When the Tsimtsum sank, Pi was left alone on a raft in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. Pi’s isolation is so tremendous that he takes relief watching the sea-life around his raft. Pi had Richard Parker (tiger), to talk to when he was bored; Pi shared all his problems with him. Pi woke up every day because he had faith in himself; he knew he had to take care of himself and Parker. Pi knew god is with him and he had hope that one day he will reach his destiny. â€Å"I was alone and orphaned, in the middle of the Pacific, hanging on to an oar, an adult tiger in front of me, sharks beneath me, a storm raging above me.† (40,133) This quote explains the start of Pi’s isolation after the